Appraisal News and Business Tips

Blog

About this blog

This blog has all my free weekly email newsletters since 2012. Plus other topics. Please note that the original email newsletter subject line has been significantly shortened. To see the original email newsletters, click here to go to the newsletter archives. The newsletter has been sent out weekly since June, 1994. To subscribe to the free email newsletters and receive them on the date they are first issued, go to www.appraisaltoday.com and sign up in the big Yellow Box!!

NOTE: All newsletters before 4/6/24 do not have the popular Liability Administrator ad in the top of the newsletter post.
Starting with the 4/6/24 newsletter it is added below the top topic.
The 30 most recent newsletters (with the LIA ad) are available in the newsletter archives at https://appraisaltoday.com/archives/
The most recent 30 appraiser newsletters start with Newz: the other emails on the list are ads.

Looking for a topic? Use Search box on the right side. There are hundreds of posts on this blog, starting in 2012. 

Every week I send out my FREE email newsletter with info on strange and weird homes and buildings, what Fannie, FHA, AMCs, UAPAP, etc. Hot topics important to appraisers. See info on the right column for topics.

I have also been publishing a paid Appraisal Today monthly newsletter since June, 1992 with in-depth articles on topics important to appraisers. This newsletter has detailed articles on appraisal topics such as Adjustments and Collateral Underwriter plus business topics such as fees, marketing tips, and productivity to get more appraisals done. Click below for more info!!

What’s the difference between the Appraisal Today free weekly email newsletters in this blog and the paid monthly newsletter?(Opens in a new browser tab)

FREE email newsletter FAQs(Opens in a new browser tab)

Posted in: Uncategorized

ROAD to Housing Act and Appraisers

Newz: ROAD to Housing Act and Appraisers, UAD 3.6 Adjustments

October 23, 2026

ARTICLE LIST – In order, Scroll down the page to read.

  • LIA AD: Judicial Appraiser Panels: Balancing Opportunity and Liability
  • 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act By Jo Traut
  • 5 Moody Gothic Victorian Homes You Can Buy for Under $500K Right Now
  • I Wish the UAD 3.6 Deadline Would Hurry Up and Get Here, By Chad Barker
  • MY AD: Appraisal Forms Software in September, 1993
  • Surviving UAD 3.6: Secondary Market Risk Protocols, By Desiree Mehbod
  • UAD 3.6 Adjustments: New Rules, Same Principles, By Doug Smith
  • MY UAD 3.6 UPDATE – Where to get free appraisal webinars and podcasts on youtube. Demos of UAD 3.6 software and other relevant topics.
  • MBA Stats: Mortgage applications decreased 5.3 percent from one week earlier

 

Thanks to our Sponsor!!!

——————————————————————

21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

By Jo Traut

Excerpts:

What Is the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act?

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (Renewing Opportunity in the American Dream) became law on July 11, 2026. The legislation addresses a wide range of housing-related issues, including housing supply, affordability, consumer protections, and modernization efforts across several federal housing programs.

Appraisal-related provisions were included as part of broader efforts to improve the homebuying process and strengthen the appraisal profession.

Several provisions are particularly relevant to appraisers, from expanded FHA eligibility to workforce development initiatives and standardized reconsideration of value procedures.

What the New Law Means for Appraisers

For years, state-licensed residential appraisers have largely been excluded from FHA appraisal work. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act could eventually change that.

The new federal law includes several appraisal-related provisions designed to expand opportunities within the profession, modernize appraisal oversight, improve consumer protections, and support the development of the next generation of appraisers.

While some changes will require additional implementation and guidance before they take effect, appraisers should begin paying attention now, especially those interested in future FHA appraisal opportunities.

Here’s what appraisers need to know about the law, its potential impact on the profession, and how to prepare for what’s ahead.

Key Changes for Appraisers

• Licensed Appraisers May Once Again Be Eligible to Perform FHA Appraisals

• Trainee Appraisers Will Be Added to the ASC National Registry

• Grants Are Authorized for Appraiser Education and Workforce Development

• Reconsiderations of Value Receive a Federal Framework

• Appraisal Oversight and Registry Funding Are Updated

• A Public Appraisal Database Study Is Underway

How Appraisers Can Prepare Now

When Will These Changes Take Effect?

To read more, Click Here

My comments: If you do lender residential appraisals, read this full article. An excellent summary of what it means for appraisals. I have been following this topic for a long time. Finally it parts of it may be implemented over time. Be ready for when they come!

——————————————————————

5 Moody Gothic Victorian Homes You Can Buy for Under $500K Right Now

Excerpts: Gothic Revival Victorian homes have remained a popular style choice for buyers since the style took hold in the United States in the mid-1800s.

Known for their striking facades with pitched roofs and for timeless interiors with stained glass, arched windows, and soaring towers, these dwellings continue to attract investors seeking a renovation project and buyers wanting to live in a historical home.

Now that it is officially spooky season, we found five moody Victorians available for under $500,000 this Halloween.

——————————————————————————–

SAMPLE VICTORIAN #5 from article (Photo above)

5. 202 W McConnell St, Oxford, IN

Price: $399,900

Excerpts: 4 bedrooms, 4,563 sq.ft, 0.66 acre lot, Built in 1908

This four-bedroom Victorian, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, has been in the same family “for more than 100 years.”

The “extraordinary” 4,563-square-foot interior has been meticulously maintained and updated. Amenities include a grand parlor, a library, “maid’s quarters,” and a sunroom. A surprising upstairs ballroom is a “special treasure” for hosting grand-scale events and celebrations. Other historic highlights include natural woodwork, hardwood floors, pocket doors, stained-glass windows, and a full basement with an original coal room and game room “offering a fascinating glimpse into life in another era.”

A carriage house can also be found on the property’s double lot.

With more than 4,500 square feet, this remarkable residence features 4 bedrooms, a grand parlor, library, ballroom, maid’s quarters, sunroom, and beautiful wraparound porch. The full basement adds even more character, including the original coal room and game area, offering a fascinating glimpse into life in another era.

Upstairs, the ballroom offers one of the home’s most special treasures. Here, you’ll discover a true time capsule of original family belongings, along with the original carpets that have witnessed generations of celebrations, gatherings, and memories. Outside, the property continues to impress. Situated on a beautiful corner lot encompassing two lots, the grounds include a charming carriage house.

To see all 5 homes, Click Here

To see more photos from the Sample Victorian, Click Here (from Zillow)

My comments: In my city, there are many historic Victorians, similar to the sample above. Back in the 1950s and 60s classic Victorians were being demolished and replaced with modern apartment buildings.

Now we have few homes available for under $1,000,000 including “starter homes”. Victorians are much more expensive, even small homes that need some work.

If you are looking at why Alameda no longer routinely demolishes its famous Victorian homes, it is due to strict local preservation laws passed in the 1970s that stripped away the economic incentive to tear them down.

Local leader Chuck Corica first entered Alameda politics specifically to stop developers from tearing down the city’s historic homes. He was elected mayor in 1975, the same year the city adopted its strict Historic Preservation Ordinance and voters passed Measure A (Article 26). This measure banned the construction of multi-unit apartment buildings, effectively creating a legal “firewall” that saved thousands of Alameda’s iconic Victorians from demolition.

Today, the city boasts one of the largest concentrations of intact Victorian-era homes in the country 60s, developers were buying them and demolishing the Victorians, replacing them with very boring modern apartments.

Sometimes I have an appraiser call me asking about HBU on Victorians. They do not know about “Measure A” which does not allow demolition even though some city zoning used to mention it.

————————————————————————-

Halloween in Alameda – World War II Haunted Aircraft Carrier

We also have have The USS Hornet (The “Grey Ghost”) Ranked #4 on California’s most haunted list, the ship is famous for reports of shadow figures, disembodied voices, recorded gunfire sounds, moving furniture, and the “Dress Whites Ghost” sailor.

Staying overnight, waiting to hear strange voices, and more, is very popular, especially around Halloween! It is also a great place for parties. I have been to a few over the years, with live music and dancing. You can get a tour of the ship also. I have never stayed there overnight – too scary for me!!!

For more information on The USS Hornet, and photos, Click Here

——————————————————————

I Wish the UAD 3.6 Deadline Would Hurry Up and Get Here

By Chad Barker

Excerpts: wish the UAD 3.6 deadline would hurry up and get here.

There, I said it.

That may not be the prevailing sentiment across the appraisal profession right now, but I mean it. The old forms are, well, old. They have served the industry for a very long time, but much of the technology, data and workflow surrounding those forms has advanced dramatically while the basic reporting structure has remained largely unchanged.

Actually, as far as I am concerned, the deadline already has arrived.

A modern appraisal firm has been preparing for months. Its appraisers have taken the training, learned the software, worked through the new terminology and, most importantly, completed real UAD 3.6 assignments. The transition is no longer theoretical. The work is happening now, and from where I sit, that is a good thing.

If your firm is not there yet, phase one may be less about technology and more about mindset. Clear the mental cloud around the change. Stop looking at UAD 3.6 primarily as something being done to the appraisal profession and start looking at what it gives us an opportunity to build. Once you do that, the future gets a lot more interesting.

The Profession Is Still the Profession

UAD 3.6 does not fundamentally change what an appraiser does. The appraiser still identifies the problem, determines the scope of work, gathers and analyzes evidence, reconciles the information and reaches a credible conclusion. Professional judgment still belongs to the appraiser.

What changes is the process around that judgment. More facts move through structured fields. Information becomes more consistent. Reporting becomes more dynamic. Validation becomes more integrated into the workflow. That is a significant change, but it is not the removal of professional judgment. In many ways, it should allow us to spend more time on judgment by improving the machinery around it.

Clients Are Learning, Too

Appraisers are not the only ones going through this transition. Clients are learning too.

Different lenders, AMCs and technology platforms will have different ordering processes, overlays, validation requirements, submission paths and escalation procedures. That makes collaboration more important.

How does the client identify the product? How is the scope communicated? Which validation issues require action? Who owns an escalation? How are recurring problems shared and corrected? Those are not just technical questions. They are customer service questions.

To read more, Click Here

I Wish the UAD 3.6 Deadline Would Hurry Up and Get Here

Are you getting too many ad-only emails?

4 ways to get only the FREE email newsletters and NOT the ad-only emails.

1. Twitter: https://twitter.com/appraisaltoday posted by noon Friday – all recent newsletters

2. Read on blog www.appraisaltoday.com/blog Posted by noon Friday. You can subscribe to the blog in the upper right of each blog page.

3. Email Archives: https://appraisaltoday.com/archives

(posted by noon Friday) The link is above and to the right of the big yellow email signup form. Newsletters start with “Newz.” Contains all recent emails sent.

4. Link to the 10 most recent newsletters (no ads) at www.appraisaltoday.com. Scroll down past the big yellow signup block.

To read more about the 4 ways, plus information on why I take ads, etc. Click here

——————————————————————

Appraisal Forms Software in September, 1993

A Glance at the Past

In the May, 2026 issue of Appraisal Today

Editor’s note: This article was originally written as a review of forms software

in in the September, 1993 issue of Appraisal Today. In 1993, there were 13

companies:

Appraisers Choice/Richard Heyn, Appraisers Edge, Day One, Dynamic

Computing, Formfill, Homeputer, MCS, Microform, Residential Appraiser

(SFREP), Softbyte, a la mode, United Systems, and WCA.

NOTE: Some say there were more than 13 companies but I could not get

their names or information.

Clickforms/Bradford started with Mac forms software in 1986 and later

switched to Windows, but was not included in my 1993 review.

Per one software observer in 1993, more forms software from other

companies was available when I started my business in 1986, but I don’t

have a list of them.

In my 1993 review I found that none of the programs were poor or inferior.

None were significantly above the typical. I had expected a wider range.

A few vendors had copy/use protection. ACI had a hardware device. Some

had customer name encryption. Others had no restrictions.

Prices were by the number of users and forms. URAR form only varied

from $199 to $595. Only one user with all forms varied from $395 to $3,995.

Most were under $1,000. ACI was the most expensive. A la mode was $395.

Some had annual support costs, from $250 to $300, which typically included

upgrades.

To read more about this topic, plus 2+ years of previous issues, subscribe to the paid Appraisal Today.

If this article helped you understand about the old forms software (UAD 2.6), it is worth the subscription price!

—————————————————————-

Not sure if you want to subscribe?

Sign up for monthly auto renewal for $8.25!

Cancel at any time for any reason!

You will receive a prorated refund.

$8.25 per month, $24.75 per quarter, and $89 per year (Best Buy)

or $99 per year or $169 for two years

Subscribers get FREE: past 18+ months of past newsletters

To purchase the Monthly Appraisal Today newsletter:

www.appraisaltoday.com/order or call 510-865-8041

What’s the difference between the Appraisal Today free Weekly email newsletters and the paid Monthly newsletter? Click here for more info

Cancel at any time for any reason!

You will receive a prorated refund.

$8.25 per month, $24.75 per quarter, and $89 per year (Best Buy)

or $99 per year or $169 for two years

Subscribers get FREE: past 18+ months of past newsletters

To purchase the Monthly Appraisal Today newsletter:

www.appraisaltoday.com/order or call 510-865-8041

——————————————————————

Surviving UAD 3.6: Secondary Market Risk Protocols

By Desiree Mehbod

Excerpts: If economic necessity forces you to accept UAD 3.6 assignments, you cannot afford to sign blindly while exposed to massive secondary market liability risks.

The reality on the ground for independent real estate appraisers is unforgiving. While the industry debates the long term dangers of data harvesting, many independent business owners face an immediate, binary choice: sign the new UAD 3.6 reports and accept Certification 25, or stop feeding your family. Not every appraiser has a robust book of private estate, divorce, and non lending work.

Transitioning away from AMCs takes time, marketing skills, and capital that many simply do not have right now. The GSEs and tech platforms know this, exploiting economic necessity to push a data first framework that drastically expands our liability.

As for me, I have already decided that I won’t be touching UAD 3.6. However, I recognize that I have the luxury of having a choice in this matter because of the structure of my specific business and client base, which allows me to focus on non GSE work. Many of my peers do not have that safety net right now. They have bills to pay and families to support, meaning they have no choice but to work within the system provided to them.

I recently spoke to a real estate contract lawyer friend

If you are an appraiser who must operate within the UAD 3.6 system to keep your business alive, you cannot afford to sign these reports passively. You must implement a strict, defensive risk management protocol on every single assignment. The goal is simple: satisfy the automated compliance gates to ensure the reports clear the portal and are accepted, while embedding a defensive legal shield inside the workfile to protect yourself from downstream lawsuits and regulatory exposure.

Certification 25 forces you to grant a broad usage license to the client’s authorized networks, but it does not completely erase your federal copyright. To prevent outside real estate agents, public syndication sites, or stray data brokers from scraping your original text and high resolution interior photographs for outside commercial gain, assert your copyright directly:

“Intellectual Property Notice: This report contains original analysis and photographs protected under federal copyright law © 2026. Consistent with the permissions granted in Certification 25, a usage license is provided to the client and authorized participants for mortgage transaction purposes. The appraiser retains all remaining proprietary rights under law.”

To read more, Click Here

My comments: Good advice on dealing with the data issues appraisers have.

——————————————————————

UAD 3.6 Adjustments: New Rules, Same Principles,

By Doug Smith

As appraisers work their way through the transition to UAD 3.6, two matters deserve some attention.

The first is the challenge of adapting our adjustment processes to the new reporting format. The second is understanding why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have changed the way certain property characteristics, particularly bedrooms and bathrooms, are reported.

These are separate issues, but they share something important: the need to understand the reasoning behind what we do.

1. The Adjustment Process: Back to Basics

With all the attention being given to learning new software, inspection procedures, and reporting requirements, it might be a good time to dust off Mark Ratterman’s Valuation by Comparison: Residential Analysis and Logic.

In the introduction to his book, Ratterman describes the role of the appraiser as:

“a researcher and interpreter of human behavior”

He goes on to explain that appraisers must understand the mind-set of typical buyers and sellers and anticipate the decisions they are likely to make.

Fannie Mae reinforces this principle in its Selling Guide, B4-1.3-09,

Adjustments to Comparable Sales:

“The appraiser’s adjustments must reflect the market’s reaction (that is, market based adjustments) to the difference in the properties.”

Fannie Mae goes further, cautioning against the use of rules of thumb when market analysis supports a different adjustment. Its example contrasts a customary $20-per-square-foot adjustment with market evidence supporting $100 per square foot.

These two statements, separated by years but closely related in principle, remind us of something fundamental about the appraisal process.

Ratterman reminds us that the appraiser must understand how buyers and sellers think. Fannie Mae reminds us that our adjustments must demonstrate how those buyers and sellers react to differences between properties.

That is the foundation of the sales comparison approach. It is not enough to recognize a difference between two properties. We must determine whether that difference matters to the market and, when it does, how much.

UAD 3.6 may change the way we collect information, organize property characteristics, and present our adjustments. But it does not change the underlying principles of valuation.

New rules. Same principles. And perhaps a good time to revisit how we develop and support our adjustments.

2. Bedrooms, Bathrooms, and a Little History

One question appearing in discussions about UAD 3.6 is why the GSEs have changed the reporting of bedrooms and bathrooms to include those located below grade in the total counts.

To understand the significance of this change, it helps to look back at Fannie Mae’s historical treatment of below-grade finished areas.

Fannie Mae has long recognized that below-grade improvements may contribute substantial value.

In its March 2, 2010 Selling Guide, Fannie Mae stated:

“Rooms that are not included in the above-grade room count may add substantially to the value of a property—particularly when the quality of the finish is high.”

The same guide recognized that strict above-grade-to-above-grade comparisons might not always be appropriate and permitted departures when the property’s design warranted them, provided the appraiser explained the reasoning.

Now, with UAD 3.6, the GSEs require above- and below-grade bedrooms and bathrooms to be included in the total counts, while retaining the distinction between levels through the Level and Room Detail table.

Viewed against that history, the change appears to be a logical progression toward more comprehensive reporting of a property’s characteristics. It does not, however, establish that above- and below-grade areas necessarily have equal contributory value.

The historical treatment of below-grade improvements illustrates an important distinction. How Fannie Mae directs appraisers to report property characteristics is not necessarily how the market assigns value to those characteristics.

Combining above- and below-grade bedroom and bathroom counts does not eliminate differences in location, utility, finish, or market acceptance. Those distinctions remain matters for the appraiser to analyze.

This raises a practical question for appraisers working with UAD 3.6. If market analysis demonstrates a difference in the contributory value of above- and below-grade bedrooms or bathrooms, how should that difference be reflected in the new adjustment grid? The reporting format may present challenges in making and displaying such adjustments. That is a matter deserving further attention as appraisers gain experience with the new system. What should not be lost in the process is the obligation to recognize and support differences demonstrated by the market.

Perhaps Fannie Mae is homogenizing the milk, but it is still up to appraisers to determine whether the cream deserves a premium!

The reporting rules may be new, but the responsibility for interpreting market behavior remains exactly where it has always been—with the appraiser.

More standardized data collection does not replace the professional judgment necessary to analyze market evidence, develop credible adjustments, and arrive at a well-supported opinion of value.

My comments: Good ideas on UAD 3.6 and adjustments.

——————————————————————

MY UAD 3.6 UPDATE – Where to get free appraisal webinars and podcasts on Youtube.

American Valuation Society Webinars on Youtube

I have been taking their webinars live and watching recordings for awhile.

I have watched UAD 3.6 software demos and many appraisal issues.

I get regular email notifications for new webinars.

The Founder and President of : American Valuation Society is Gynell Vestal (AQB Certified USPAP Instructor and CDEI) who serves as the president and founder of the organization. She often moderates the webinars and is very effective in running them.

I receive email notices of their new podcasts.

To see the availailable webinars, go to

https://www.youtube.com/@avsocietyorg

—————————————————————————-

Appraiser eLearning Podcasts on Youtube

Free recordings of their regular podcasts. Worth watching. Keeps up to date on hot appraisal topics and many other topics.

Good Recent Podcast 10-20-26 – The UAD 3.6 Exception: What Happens Next? From Appraiser eLearning. I recently watched it. asy to understand. Discusses lender extension and deadlines.

GSE Seller Exceptions are complicated and not easy to understand when reading about them.

This 10-20-26 video interviews Kim Perotti, Co-President of Axis and Mark Ayton, SVP of Business Strategy at Axis AMC. I interviewed them soon after they started in 2009 when AMCs first started. Click here to Watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfKqmuywLNc

To see other available Appraiser eLearning Podcasts, go to https://www.youtube.com/@AppraisereLearning

——————————————————————

HOW TO USE THE NUMBERS BELOW. Appraisals are ordered after the loan application. These numbers tell you the future for the next few weeks. For more information on how they are compiled, click here.

Note: I publish a graph of this data every month in my paid monthly newsletter, Appraisal Today. For more information or get a FREE sample go to www.appraisaltoday.com/order Or call 510-865-8041, MTW, 7 AM to noon, Pacific time.

My comments: Rates are going up and down in 2026.

Mortgage applications decreased 5.3 percent from one week earlier

WASHINGTON, D.C. (October 21, 2026) — Mortgage applications decreased 5.3 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending October 16, 2026.

The Market Composite Index, a measure of mortgage loan application volume, decreased 5.3 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis from one week earlier.  On an unadjusted basis, the Index decreased 5 percent compared with the previous week. The Refinance Index decreased 2 percent from the previous week and was 59 percent lower than the same week one year ago. The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index decreased 7 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index decreased 7 percent compared with the previous week and was 18 percent lower than the same week one year ago.

“Mortgage rates decreased for the first time in over two months, with the 30-year fixed rate dropping to 7.41 percent. However, lower rates were not enough to boost application activity, as both purchase and refinance applications continued to decline,” said Joel Kan, CMB, MBA’s Vice President and Deputy Chief Economist. “Purchase applications fell 18 percent behind last year’s pace, as higher rates are pricing buyers out of the market. The ARM share held steady at 10.5 percent, as ARM rates remained almost a full percentage point lower than the 30-year fixed rate, giving qualified borrowers a lower rate option to purchase a home.”

Added Kan, “It is very clear that the higher mortgage rate environment has cooled the housing market this fall.”

The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 39.0 percent of total applications from 37.7 percent the previous week. The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) share of activity remained unchanged at 10.5 percent of total applications.

The FHA share of total applications decreased to 16.3 percent from 16.4 percent the week prior. The VA share of total applications decreased to 11.5 percent from 11.9 percent the week prior. The USDA share of total applications decreased to 0.5 percent from 0.6 percent the week prior.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($832,750 or less) decreased to 7.41 percent from 7.50 percent, with points decreasing to 0.75 from 0.83 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent loan-to-value ratio (LTV) loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with jumbo loan balances (greater than $832,750) decreased to 7.33 percent from 7.49 percent, with points decreasing to 0.60 from 0.70 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages backed by the FHA decreased to 7.13 percent from 7.19 percent, with points decreasing to 1.15 from 1.21 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to 6.73 percent from 6.87 percent, with points decreasing to 0.73 from 0.90 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The average contract interest rate for 5/1 ARMs decreased to 6.46 percent from 6.54 percent, with points decreasing to 1.11 from 1.13 (including the origination fee) for 80 percent LTV loans. The effective rate decreased from last week.

The survey covers U.S. closed-end residential mortgage applications originated through retail and consumer direct channels. The survey has been conducted weekly since 1990. Respondents include mortgage bankers, commercial banks, thrifts, and credit unions. Base period and value for all indexes is March 16, 1990=100.

——————————————————————

Ann O’Rourke, MAI, SRA, MBA

Appraiser and Publisher Appraisal Today

1826 Clement Ave. Suite 203 Alameda, CA 94501

Phone: 510-865-8041

Email:  ann@appraisaltoday.com

Online: www.appraisaltoday.com

Posted in: appraisal regulations, Appraisal Software, UAD 3.6

UAD 3.6 Fees for Appraisers

Newz: UAD 3.6 Fees, Fun Appraiser Game, Who Can Get Your Appraisal Data?

October 16, 2026

ARTICLE LIST – In order, Scroll down the page to read

  • LIA AD: Problem with An Affidavit
  • UAD 3.6 and the Appraisal Fee Chain: Who Actually Sets the Fee?, By Doug Smith, SRA
  • Lots Under Water
  • Certification 25: The 20-Year Fight Over Who Gets to Use Your Data, By Isaac Peck, WorkingRE, Publisher
  • Appraiser Game – Something FUN, By Dustin Harris
  • MY AD: 2026 E&O Update – Claims, Payment Options, Lawsuits, Etc
  • Inspectors Blocked the Door, Appraisers handed over the Keys By Desiree Mehbod
  • MBA STATS: Mortgage applications decreased 2.7 percent from one week earlier

 

Thanks to our Sponsor!!!

——————————————————-

UAD 3.6 and the Appraisal Fee Chain: Who Actually Sets the Fee?

By Doug Smith, SRA

“…the higgling and bargaining of the market…”

— Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776

There has been considerable discussion about appraisal fees as UAD 3.6 is implemented. Much of the criticism over resistance to fee increases has been directed at Appraisal Management Companies.

But before deciding where responsibility lies, perhaps we need to follow what might be called the appraisal fee chain.

It begins with the borrower

A consumer seeking to purchase or refinance a residence provides information to a lender. The familiar conventional mortgage application is the Uniform Residential Loan Application (URLA), also known as Freddie Mac Form 65/Fannie Mae Form 1003.

For federal mortgage disclosure purposes, an application is considered received once the lender has six pieces of information: the consumer’s name, income, Social Security number, property address, estimated property value, and desired loan amount.

Once those items have been received, the lender generally must provide a Loan Estimate within three business days.

That Loan Estimate includes estimated loan and closing costs, including the anticipated cost of an appraisal when one is required.

This is where the appraisal fee chain gets interesting.

Federal disclosure rules limit how much certain estimated charges can increase between the Loan Estimate and closing. Depending on the circumstances, some required third-party service charges may be subject to a 10% cumulative tolerance, while others are subject to different rules. A valid changed circumstance may also permit a revised Loan Estimate.

So here is the first question:

Does the appraisal amount initially disclosed to the borrower influence the fee that can later be offered to the appraiser?

Once the borrower indicates an intent to proceed, the appraisal ordering process moves forward. Depending on the lender’s business model, the appraisal may be ordered directly from an appraiser or through an AMC.

Eventually, an assignment reaches an appraiser with a proposed fee.

But where in the appraisal fee chain was that number actually established?

Was it established by the lender when estimating the cost of the loan?

Was it established through an existing agreement or fee schedule between the lender and AMC?

Does the AMC determine the fee it offers the appraiser?

For lenders ordering directly, are they expecting UAD 3.6 assignments to be completed for the same fees previously paid for UAD 2.6 assignments?

And when an appraiser responds that the proposed fee is inadequate, how far back up the appraisal fee chain does that information travel?

These questions matter because UAD 3.6 changes the appraisal product and, for many appraisers, the process required to produce it. Appraisers are investing in training, software and equipment. Inspection procedures and data collection are changing. During the transition, the time required to complete an assignment may change as well.

Yet much of the current discussion seems to begin with the assumption that the appraisal fee should remain where it was.

Perhaps the question should not simply be, “Why won’t AMCs increase appraisal fees?”

The better question may be:

Where in the appraisal fee chain is the price of a UAD 3.6 appraisal actually being established—and is there still room for the market to establish a different price?

Nearly 250 years ago, Adam Smith described part of that price-setting process as the “higgling and bargaining of the market.”

Appraisers are participants in that market too.

A proposed fee is a proposal, not necessarily the market price.

Perhaps it is time for a little more higgling and bargaining.

My comments: I had never known about this before. Thanks to Doug Smith for the info!

Read more!! →

Posted in: appraisal business, Appraisal fees, E&O

For Appraisers: FHA Adopting UAD 3.6

Newz: FHA Adopting UAD 3.6, AO-41: Tech Guidance, Analysis of 2026 Appraisal Licenses, Certification 25 (in UAD 3.6)

October 9, 2026

ARTICLE LIST – Scroll down to see the articles, in order

  • LIA AD: “Off the cuff” opinions
  • FHA Announces Optional Broad Production Period for Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) 3.6
  • Summary of Proposed Changes to HUD Handbook 4000.1 – September 2026
  • 8.5-Acre Waterfront Palm Beach Megamansion Owned by Billionaire Tech Mogul Is Listed for a Staggering $165 Million
  • (Advisory Opinion) AO-41: TAF’s New Tech Guidance and What It Means, By Isaac Peck, Publisher WorkingRE
  • MYAD: UAD 3.6 – A Phase-In Approach: Get the Report Done first By Doug Smith, SRA
  • Certification 25 and the Quiet Breach of Appraiser Confidentiality, By Desiree Mehbod, Part 1 and 2
  • Analysis of 2026 ASC Appraisal License Data By Chase Pursley
  • MY UAD 3.6 UPDATE – Exemption clarifications, Cert 25, VA
  • MBA STATS: Mortgage applications decreased 6.0 percent from one week earlier

FHA Announces Optional Broad Production Period for Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) 3.6

FHA is pleased to announce a major step toward implementation of Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) 3.6. Following the successful completion of beta testing, FHA’s Electronic Appraisal Delivery (EAD) portal is now available for an optional broad production period for mortgagees to submit appraisals using UAD 3.6.

This optional phase gives mortgagees flexibility to transition to UAD 3.6 for FHA cases prior to the government sponsored enterprises’ (GSEs’) mandatory transition scheduled for November 2, 2026.

What you need to know and do now:

Effective immediately, all FHA-approved mortgagees participating in Title II forward mortgage and Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) programs may begin submitting appraisals in the UAD 3.6 format.

Mortgagees may continue to deliver all or some of their appraisals to the EAD portal in the legacy UAD 2.6 format.

For a given case number, the same UAD format of the initial submission must be used in all subsequent appraisal submissions for that case ― submission of multiple formats is not permitted.

FHA will continue to gather information to assess mortgagee transition readiness before establishing and announcing an FHA mandatory adoption date.

Mortgagees and appraisers should review the UAD 3.6 Implementation Preparedness Toolbox resource, available on the EAD portal webpage, for key technical specifications and transition guidance.

To read the UAD 3.6 Implementation Preparedness Toolbox, Click Here

To read the announcement (pdf) , FHA INFO 2026-23, with more links,

My comment: Good to see what FHA is doing. For VA info, see MY UAD 3.6 UPDATE below

Read more!! →

Posted in: Appraisal Standards Board, Appraisal Subcomitee, Appraiser Survey, ASB Appraisal Standards Board, Fannie, FHA, GSEs

GSEs Create Exception for UAD 3.6 Deadline for Approved Lenders

Newz: GSEs Create Exception for UAD 3.6 Deadline for Approved Lenders Through May 19, 2027, Weather Impact on Appraisals

October 2, 2026

ARTICLE LIST – Scroll down the page to read

  • LIA AD: Weather Impact
  • GSEs Create Exception for UAD 3.6 Deadline for Approved Lenders Through May 19, 2027, Plus ACI Update, By Frank Andorka, Managing Editor, WorkingRE
  • Palm Beach’s Landmark ‘Ham and Cheese House’ Is Listed for an $105 Million
  • MY AD: Disciplinary Proceedings: What Conduct Leads to Discipline? By Claudia Gaglione
  • The Mathematics of Judgment By Dustin Harris
  • Fewer Appraisers. Better Appraisers. Which One Are You Going to Be? By Dustin Harris
  • MY UAD 3.6 UPDATE – ACI NEWS:Only the desk top version is withdrawn. The cloud base program still works.
  • 18th Annual Appraisal Summit in Las Vegas – Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 2026.

Hear what the GSEs say about Nov. 3. All the software vendors will be there – demos, questions. Network with appraisers.

HAVE FUN! OCTOBER 31 IS HALLOWEEN!!

  • MBA stats: Mortgage applications decreased 6.0 percent from one week earlier

———————————————————————

GSEs New Exception for UAD 3.6 Deadline for Approved Sellers : Runs through May 19, 2027
PLUS ACI UPDATE

By Frank Andorka, Managing Editor, WorkingRE

Approved sellers who are unable to fully implement UAD 3.6 before the formal Nov. 2, 2026, deadline will be allowed to continue submitting legacy UAD 2.6 appraisal reports through May 19, 2027, according to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The GSEs will also allow resubmissions of UAD 2.6 appraisal reports through June 27, 2027. As of March 1, 2027, UAD 2.6 appraisals will no longer qualify for certain appraisal-related representations and warranties relief.

From March 1 through May 19, 2027, UAD 2.6 reports will receive a Collateral Underwriter® (CU) risk score of 999 when submitted to Fannie Mae, and their functionality will be reduced in both CU and Loan Collateral Advisor®. The GSEs encourage sellers to fully adopt UAD 3.6 as soon as possible, as this is a one-time policy exception that will not be extended.

“Many lenders are submitting UAD 3.6 appraisal reports; however, some lenders may need more time to adopt,” the GSEs said in the release announcing the exception.

Submitting a UAD 2.6 report after Nov. 2 will require explicit approval from the GSEs. To request a policy exception, a representative of the seller who is authorized to enter into a binding contract must complete the online UAD 3.6 Policy Exception Request for each GSE to which it sells loans.

To read the GSE UAD 3.6 Policy Exception documents, Click Here

====================================

ACI Update

In a perhaps unrelated announcement the day before (September 29, 2026) the GSEs announcement, ACI, an appraisal software that has been serving appraisers for decades, signaled that they were scrapping ACI Sky™ Workbench, it’s UAD 3.6-compliant appraisal report.

ACI wrote on its Facebook page:

“After careful consideration, we’ve made the decision to stop the current version of ACI Sky™ Workbench and focus our efforts on developing a significantly improved Workbench 2.0 experience, targeted for release in Spring 2027…. Access to the current ACI Sky Workbench platform will end October 9, 2026.”

Appraisers in the comments on ACI’s post reported they had been in communication with ACI and were told that “there was no interim solution in place for current ACI subscribers for completing UAD 3.6 assignments,” according to one appraiser. That same appraiser quoted an email he received as saying: “At this time, the information provided to us confirms that ACI Desktop will remain available for existing UAD 2.6 and legacy workflows, but it does not provide a confirmed interim ACI workflow for completing UAD 3.6 reports after Workbench is removed.”

To read the full WorkingRE article, Click Here

My comments on Exceptions:

THIS DOES NOT CHANGE THE NOVEMBER 2, 2026 DATE FOR ALL SELLERS/ LENDERS (WITHOUT APPROVED EXCEPTIONS) TO ONLY SUBMIT UAD 3.6 APPRAISALS.

I read an online post from an appraiser about using prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket for The UAD 3.6 deadline of November 2. The post had several interesting comments posted.

My opinion has been No Change for November 2 for awhile. The GSEs have seen successful appraisal and lender submissions for awhile. Now they have a way to keep the deadline with one exception.

I am not surprised. I have known for a long time that the “weak link” is the lenders not the appraisers. Appraisers just have to learn how to do the changes in reporting. Lenders have to redo their computer systems for all the changes.

I attended two event sessions where GSE representatives were speaking. I asked them about what was happening with lenders. They did not say much.

I was available to find very little help for lenders online.

What appraisers need to do – a few ideas

Learn about the new Exceptions and what is required. It is complicated.

To read the GSE UAD 3.6 Policy Exception documents, Click Here

When a lender requests an appraisal be sure you both agree on what type of appraisal will be needed: UAD 3.6 or 2.6. Get the request in writing.

To be sure, you could ask if they have an approved Exception. Then you will know they will be submitting a UAD 2.6 appraisal.

A few ideas from Doug Smith

1. Keep training on 3.6. The exception postpones the deadline for some lenders. It doesn’t retire the format.

2. Get the format in writing. On every order after Nov 2, confirm 2.6 or 3.6 in the engagement letter, especially for FHA and VA.

3. Ask lender clients whether they’ve requested the exception from one GSE, both, or neither.

4. Expect a dual-track transition. Some clients will still order 2.6 into 2027. Others will move early to avoid the March 1 penalties.

Status of FHA and VA – unknown currently. Lots of rumors and comments.

In future Friday newsletters I will let you know more, as it becomes available. It is complicated. I received notification of these new exceptions on September 30, 2026. I had limited research time available before my newsletter deadline on October 2, 2026 at 6:30 AM.

Many thanks to WorkingRE for writing this article on November 2026 about the new GSE Exception changes and ACI update!

Read more!! →

Posted in: adjustments, GSEs, state appraiser regulators, UAD 3.6

New Fannie Highest and Best Use Playbook

Newz: New Fannie Highest and Best Use Playbook, UAD 3.6 Nov. 2 and Other Deadlines??

September, 25, 2026

ARTICLE LIST:

In Order, Scroll down the page to read

  • LIA AD: Conflicting Assignments and Professional Ethics
  • New Fannie Highest and Best Use Playbook and Q&As
  • For the Price of a San Francisco Condo, You Can Buy a 400-Acre Historic Marshland Retreat
  • UAD 3.6 — Whose November 2 Deadline Is It? There are many dates!! By Doug Smith, SRA
  • MY AD: Make use of your driving time by exercising
  • Rethinking Private Appraisal Delivery: Building Interactive Web Reports with AI By Dustin Harris
  • MBA stats: Mortgage applications decreased 1.5 percent from one week earlier

 

Thanks to our Sponsor!!!

Very reasonable prices and good open rates for our ads!

————————————————————

New Fannie Highest and Best Use Playbook and Q&As

By Dave Towne

For those of you doing (or will do) the New URAR/UAD 3.6 mortgage lending reports from now into the future, you need to read and understand this new policy change from FannieMae. Because this new UAD report process also applies to FreddieMac, my presumption is they will issue a policy statement of their own with similar wording.

For the time being, here is the FNMA new policy, issued on Sept. 2, 2026: Highest and best use requirements for Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) 3.6

This policy updates the highest and best use requirements for appraisal reports completed using Uniform Appraisal Dataset (UAD) 3.6.

These changes apply only to UAD 3.6 appraisal assignments to support the new Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR) reporting requirements and do not apply to appraisal reports completed using legacy appraisal report forms.

We updated our policy to:

• require the property’s highest and best use, as improved or as proposed, to be a residential use, rather than requiring it to be the property’s present use;

• define present use, residential use, and subordinate use in the context of highest and best use;

• require the property to be a primarily residential one- to four-unit property, with any non-residential use subordinate to the residential use, replacing the previous “residential in nature” guidance; and

• establish the eligibility criteria and reporting requirements for one- to four-unit residential properties when the present use does not satisfy one or more of the highest and best use tests.

The UAD 3.6 Policy Supplement has been updated to reflect these changes.

Effective: This policy change is effective immediately for appraisal reports completed using UAD 3.6.

Remember, to be USPAP compliant, you can’t “just check the box” on the New URAR/UAD 3.6 data base input field (or on the Legacy forms either) to indicate ‘present use,’ and then move on. You must add a written statement in that site section comment input field explaining why you decided that is the accurate use of the property. Craft your statement to comply with the above policy.

Also remember this: if you decide the property’s H&BU is not Residential use, you must check the box “No.” In most cases, when you do that, the need to complete a full appraisal report ends at that point because the lender cannot proceed with a residential mortgage loan. Your statement needs to define what the actual use is if not Residential. Stop working on the report and contact your client to fully explain the current situation. Let them determine how to proceed.

—————————————————————–

What is in Fannie’s New The Highest & Best Use 25 page Playbook (Per Fannie)

• This playbook provides key concepts and illustrative scenarios to help industry participants better understand how the results of the highest and best use (HBU) may affect loan eligibility.

• Each scenario presents a complex highest and best use question based on the specific circumstances of a subject property. While every property has its own unique characteristics and circumstances, which may lead to different conclusions, these scenarios are designed to demonstrate how you can apply Fannie Mae policy consistently across a range of situations. They are intended to provide practical guidance and support informed, policy-compliant decision-making.

• A resolution is provided for each scenario, along with the appraiser and lender responsibilities with relevant Fannie Mae Selling Guide Supplement: Uniform Appraisal Data (UAD) 3.6 Policy resources.

• The Highest and Best Use Frequently Asked Questions document addresses common questions related to present use, highest and best use, mixed-use properties, analysis of subordinate uses, comparable sales, the URAR, and loan eligibility. The document is available separately and linked throughout the Playbook for easy reference.

To read the Highest and Best Use Playbook, Click Here

To read the separate FAQ document, with 27 Q&As, Click Here

My comments: Many thanks (again) to Dave Towne for writing a summary of the 25 page document at the top of this article. To subscribe to his regular emails, send an email to dtowne@fidalgo.net . Say that you want to subscribe to his list. I have been subscribing for many years.


Read more!! →

Posted in: AI, appraisal, appraisal how to, Fannie

UAD 3.6 — Whose November 2 Deadline Is It?

UAD 3.6 — Whose November 2 Deadline Is It?

By Doug Smith, SRA

There may be an important misunderstanding about the November 2, 2026 UAD 3.6 mandate.

November 2 is not the deadline for the appraiser to deliver a UAD 2.6 appraisal to the lender or AMC. It is the deadline for a new UAD 2.6 appraisal to have already made its initial submission to UCDP.

That distinction matters.

An appraiser could complete a legacy UAD 2.6 appraisal before November 2 and deliver it to the client before November 2—and it could still be too late. If its initial submission to UCDP occurs on or after November 2, UCDP will return a Fatal message and a “Not Successful” status.

The GSE transition timeline provides a remarkably clear example. A UAD 2.6 appraisal is ordered on October 1. It is not initially submitted to UCDP until November 5. The result: Not Successful. The timeline states that UAD 2.6 appraisals must be submitted to UCDP before the mandate or converted to UAD 3.6.

So an appraiser looking at November 2 as “the last day I can finish a legacy appraisal” is looking at the wrong date.

The appraiser’s practical deadline has to be earlier.

The GSEs recognize this. Their guidance tells lenders to allow enough time to order, receive and submit remaining UAD 2.6 reports before November 2. They are also encouraging lenders to begin ordering UAD 3.6 reports before the mandate.

What Happens to a Report Caught in the Pipeline?

Suppose an appraiser accepts a UAD 2.6 assignment in October, inspects the property, completes the appraisal and delivers it to the lender before November 2. For whatever reason, however, its initial UCDP submission does not occur until after the mandate.

The GSE timeline says the UAD 2.6 appraisal must have been submitted before the mandate or converted to UAD 3.6.

That word “converted” deserves some thought.

What does conversion mean to an appraiser who has already inspected the property, collected the data, completed the analysis and delivered a legacy report? Does the appraiser have all the information required by UAD 3.6? Would another inspection be necessary because information required for the new report was not collected during the original inspection? How much can the software actually convert? How much additional work will be required? And who will be responsible for the additional time and fee?

Those are questions better considered before accepting the assignment than after a completed UAD 2.6 appraisal has missed the UCDP deadline.

There is also an important distinction. If the initial UAD 2.6 appraisal was successfully submitted to UCDP before November 2, later revisions can continue in UAD 2.6 using the existing Document File ID during the transition period.

But the Road Is Still Under Construction

Yes, appraisal software continues to be a road under construction. But the appraisal profession has repeatedly proven its resiliency.

Now is the time to seek out workable solutions, rely on the ingenuity of innovation, and make the best use of the tools we have under admittedly challenging circumstances.

The November 2 mandate is approaching whether every software feature is finished or not.

Perhaps It Is Time for Appraisers to Take the Lead

From this point forward, perhaps one simple question should become part of accepting a residential appraisal assignment:

“Is this appraisal intended for submission to UCDP?”

If the answer is yes, perhaps the next question should be:

“Should this assignment be completed using UAD 3.6 rather than the legacy UAD 2.6 format?”

That does not mean the appraiser unilaterally changes the client’s reporting requirements. It means the appraiser raises the question while the assignment conditions and reporting requirements can still be clarified—rather than after the appraisal has been completed.

Not every residential appraisal is headed to UCDP, which is precisely why the first question is important.

For appraisers already completing and delivering UAD 3.6 reports, the transition is already underway. For those who have chosen to sit it out until the mandate, the published requirements now make clear what November 2 actually means.

Perhaps the most important group is somewhere in between—appraisers who have trained, experimented with 3.6, or are preparing for it, but continue to accept most assignments in 2.6.

For that group, the next several weeks may be critical.

Both UAD 2.6 and UAD 3.6 can currently move through the transition process. On November 2, that choice ends for new UCDP submissions.

Perhaps our transition date should not be November 2. Perhaps our transition should begin now, one assignment at a time.

 

 

 

Posted in: Uncategorized

Artificial Intelligence Will Not Replace Appraisers

Newz: Freddie ADU Guide, AMCs, AI and Appraisal Photos, FHA QC Changes

September 18, 2026

What’s in This Newsletter (In Order, Scroll Down)

  • LIA AD: Expanding Intended Users? Not So Fast
  • A Practical Guide to Appraising Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) By Freddie Mac
  • Artificial Intelligence Will Not Replace Appraisers By Tony Pistilli
  • Former 1847 Ohio Jail Goes Under Offer for $400K: How One Family Turned Inmate Cells Into Pantries and Closets
  • MY AD: The Appraisal Triangle: Knowledge. Experience, Aptitude and Attitude
  • HUD Rewrites FHA Appraisal Quality Control by Kenneth J. Mullinix
  • If the Management Model Is So righteous, Spread It Around (AMCs)
  • MY UAD 3.6 UPDATE How the get the list of GSE validated UAD 3.6 software vendors, Facebook page to read appraiser comments on UAD 3.6 software.
  • MBA stats: Mortgage applications decreased 4.1 percent from one week earlier

A Practical Guide to Appraising Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

By Freddie Mac

Excerpts: Sample Topics:

Appraisal Considerations:

Firstly, an appraiser can’t simply ignore an ADU. If the determination is made that additional finished area qualifies and meets the definition of an ADU, there are some practical steps the appraiser must take in the analysis.

Appraisal Development:

The appraiser will need to determine any effect the ADU has on the market value or marketability of the subject property. The appraiser’s analysis must be documented in the appraisal report and conclude whether an adjustment is supported for the ADU (remembering that the conclusion for no adjustment also requires market support).

Allowable Flexibility:

A good best practice for any appraiser is to reference and use Freddie Mac resources and published appraisal guidelines, which detail the steps an appraiser may take when valuing a property with an ADU. If a subject property ADU complies with zoning and land use requirements, the appraisal report must include at least one comparable sale with an ADU. If not available, then the appraiser may consider an older sale from the subject’s market or a competing market. The appraiser may also expand the search and comparison beyond just three sales, including pending contract sales or listings to justify the support for adjustments.

My comments: If you appraise ADUs, or are just curious, read this article from Freddie Mac!

To read more, Click Here

My comments: If you appraise properties with ADUs, read this detailed and practical advice for appraisers.

Read more!! →

Posted in: ADUs, AI, AMCs, FHA, UAD 3.6

Apps and Digital Tools for Appraisers

Newz: Apps and Digital Tools for Appraisers,
AMCs and Value Pressure,
Deleted MLS Photos

September 11, 2026

What’s in This Newsletter (In Order, Scroll Down)

  • LIA AD: Vacant Land: Make Sure You are Appraising the Right Property
  • Essential Mobile Apps and Digital Tools for Appraisers in 2026
  • From Postwar Housing Solution to ‘Brady Bunch’ Fame—Is the Split-Level Home Ready for a Comeback?
  • Readiness Extends Beyond the Appraiser’s Report By Laurie Egan
  • MY AD: Bracketing Has No Empirical Support and Encourages Bias By Tim Andersen, MAI
  • Valutrust Turns the ROV Into a Pressure Tool