What is the White House Worth? Nearly $400 Million, Says Zillow
Beautiful airports and Victorians under $200,000
Unique and Beautiful Airports Around the World
Architecture that redefines what it means to travel in style.
All I can say is WoW!! Take a break for a few minutes and look at these photos…
Affordable homes from all over the country (Hint: No fixers)
Just scroll down the pages.
7 Victorians under $200,000 (No tiny homes)
8 homes under $100,000 (Hint: no fixers)
My comment: Wow!! Those Victorians in my city would be way over $1,000,000 on lots under 5,000 sq.ft. !!!
Sadly, The Appraisal Institute is now working against its local chapters by Jonathan Miller, posted 12/9/16
Read more!! →
Appraisal Foundation issues Draft White Paper – Alternative Valuation Products and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
“At the request of its Industry Advisory Council, The Appraisal Foundation has drafted the attached white paper on Alternative Valuation Products and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).“
“The white paper is intended to provide information to assist appraisers, users of appraisal services, and others, with a greater understanding of Alternative Valuation Products and their use in the marketplace. The paper also attempts to view these products in light of an appraiser’s USPAP obligations.“
“All interested parties are encouraged to comment in writing before the deadline of December 31, 2013. Respondents should be assured that each comment will be thoroughly read and considered.“
Included are BPOs, AVMs, CMAs,
– Appraiser Price Opinions (APOs)
– Reconciliation Review Non-Standard Desktop Valuations/Field – – Reviews Full inspection proprietary appraisal form (non-GSE form)
My comment: lenders have been looking for an alternative to an appraisal report for a long, long time. For many fee appraisers, the issue is a low fee, even if it is uspap compliant. FYI, the Industry Advisory Council is composed of representatives from lenders, AMCs, etc. Of course, it is not the total fee, but the per hour billing, that is most important. If you get $400 for a report and spend 8 hours (including travel time, stips, etc.) you make $50 per hour. If you spend 4 hours for a $250 appraisal fee, you also make $62.50 per hour. Don’t make the mistake of focusing on the total fee.
Click here to read the 36-page document. The first 13 pages is the main section. The remainder is mostly excerpts from state laws.
ASC notice to state regulators:
Excerpt: The Hotline will begin operation no later than March 29,2013. The Hotline will refer complainants to appropriate State and/or Federal agencies to handlecomplaints of alleged violations of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice(USPAP) and/or appraisal independence requirements. The Hotline will direct complainants tocontact you to formally file their complaint using the existing protocols established by your State.The Hotline does not initiate complaints, act on behalf of complainants, arbitrate complaints, assistin appealing the outcome of complaints, or follow up on complaint referrals previously provided
Link to full notice:
Feb 4, ASA/NAIFA sends letter to ASC asking for delay
Excerpts of a few bullet points:
– The ASC designed the appraisal complaint hotline system behind closed doors, and has failed to allow stakeholders to comment on it prior to final implementation:
– The ASC’s hotline system, as proposed, violates congressional intent and the clear language of the dodd-frank provision authorizing it:
– Congress intended the hotline to provide appraisers with an ability to report efforts to undermine their independence, not as a catch-all mechanism to be used against appraisers by persons disgruntled because the appraised value did not meet their needs or for other non-specific or Non-serious reasons:
Feb 12, AI/ASFMRA sends letter to ASC asking for delay
However, in speaking with state appraiser regulatory officials, practicing appraisers and others involved with real estate and mortgage finance, virtually no understanding of the hotline and its intended purpose, as well as the proposed protocol, exists. As such, we believe that the protocol could be met with unnecessary trepidation simply because to date the ASC did not seek stakeholder input. As such, we respectfully request that the ASC refrain from approving the protocol, and instead release the protocol for public comment, similar to the process used by the ASC in drafting Policy Statements. Since the hotline likely will impact other mortgage and real estate professionals and regulatory agencies, we believe that all stakeholders deserve to have an opportunity to review comment on the hotline before it is operational. This is the foundation of good government and, in this case, we believe that such a measure actually will engender support for the proposed protocol.
My comments: The ASC was mandated by law to set this up. I have not read all these links, so I have no opinion. It is all up to you!!
The Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) has issued the following document:
Issued on November 30, 2012
Written comments requested by January 25, 2013
Third Exposure Draft of Proposed Changes for the 2014-15 edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)
This exposure draft includes:
Revisions to Reporting and Communication Requirements
Retirement of STANDARDS 4 and 5
Other revisions and additions as needed to ensure clarity and relevance
Summary of proposed changes:
– Proposed Retirement of STANDARDS 4 and 5 (including revisions and additional Illustrations proposed for Advisory Opinion 21)
– Proposed Revisions to the DEFINITIONS of “Assignment Results,” “Report,” and “Scope of Work”
– Proposed Revisions to the RECORD KEEPING RULE- Report Options (includes proposal for options in STANDARDS 2, 8, and 10)
– Proposed Revisions to Advisory Opinion 11, Content of the Appraisal Report Options of Standards Rules 2-2 and 8-2 and Advisory Opinion 12, Use of the Appraisal Report Options of Standards Rules 2-2 and 8-2
– Proposed Revisions to the COMPETENCY RULE
– Proposed Revisions to the PREAMBLE – When Do USPAP Rules and Standards Apply?
– Proposed Revisions to Standards Rule 3-5
– Certification Requirement Related to Current or Prospective Interest and Prior Services
The Board currently intends to adopt any revisions for the 2014-15 edition of USPAP at its public meeting in San Francisco on February 1, 2013.
Any such revisions would become effective on January 1, 2014, and any updates related to USPAP course material should be available by late summer 2013.
Send Comments to ASBComments@appraisalfoundation.org
If there are any issues in this USPAP draft, be sure to speak out by 1/25/13!! This may be your Last Chance!! Members of the ASB read all comments.