Newz: 24 Hour Appraisal, Disclose When Some One Else Did the Inspection
November 7, 2025
What’s in This Newsletter (In Order, Scroll Down)
- LIA AD: When a Property Owner Wants to Do the Appraiser’s Job
- The Hazards of Signing a URAR When Another Person Conducts the Inspection
- Honolulu Diamond Head Estate for $34,000,000
- The 24-Hour Appraisal Funded by Appraisers
- How Policy, Data, and Technology Are Reshaping Lending and Valuation: MBA 2025 Recap
- MBA: Mortgage applications decreased 1.9 percent from one week earlier
———————————————————————–
Click here to subscribe to our FREE weekly appraiser email newsletter and get the latest appraisal news
———————————————–
———————————————-
The Hazards of Signing a URAR When Another Person Conducts the Inspection
By Dan Bradley
Excerpts: When using the Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR) to report the results of an appraisal, the appraiser’s signature on the report is not merely a formality, it is a certification. By affixing his or her signature, the appraiser is certifying to (among other things) having personally made an interior and exterior inspection of the subject property.
Clients, AMCs, and state regulatory agencies are reporting that appraisers are increasingly delegating their inspection responsibilities to others yet are signing the URAR certifying they made a personal inspection.
What are the risks if an appraiser signs a URAR report certifying an interior and exterior inspection that was actually conducted by someone else?
Conclusion
Signing a URAR appraisal report that states the appraiser personally inspected the property, when in fact another party performed the inspection, is a serious liability risk. USPAP permits an appraiser to value a property that they did not make an interior and exterior inspection.
However, USPAP does not allow an appraiser to communicate a misleading report. A report that falsely indicates that an individual made an inspection of a property when in fact they did not is misleading, and could result in disciplinary action, civil liability, or other negative consequences.
To read more, Click Here
My comments: Good reminder, especially with the use by the GSEs of alternative valuation methods. Of course, you know nothing about the qualifications of the person doing the inspection. The article did not specifically address UAD 3.6, but I assume it would have the same certification section and requirements.




Waterfront Home in Boca Raton, FL $25,000,000


Excerpts: A student contacted me with the following dilemma concerning an Appraisal Management Company (AMC) request: “I told the Management Company that I cannot mark the Zoning Compliance as ‘Legal’ if the report is marked “as-is,” because this would not be true for the current “as-is” condition of the subject on the effective date of the appraisal. The AMC insists that as long as I disclose in the addendum that the zoning is currently ‘illegal,’ then I can mark on the first page as ‘Legal.’”